.. include:: /includes/_links.rst

Further Development
-------------------

Although PySNMP is already a mature software and it is being used at many
places, the ultimate goal of the project is to implement most of the useful
features that SNMP standards can offer. What follows is a list of most
prominent missing features that PySNMP developers are planning to put their
hands on in the future.

PySNMP library
++++++++++++++

#. Built-in MIB parser. PySNMP uses a data model of its own to work with
   information contained in MIB files. To convert ASN.1-based MIB texts
   into Python modules, an off-line, third-party tool is employed. As it
   turns out, this approach has two major drawback: one is that PySNMP
   users may need to pre-process MIB texts to use them with their
   PySNMP-based applications. Another is that LibSMI's Python driver
   seems to miss some information carried by MIBs. Thus the solution would
   be to write another MIB parser and code generator which would produce
   PySNMP compliant Python code right from MIB text files all by itself.

   **Done:** see `PySMI`_` project in conjunction with the latest PySNMP codebase.

#. Reverse MIB index. The variable-bindings received by the system whilst
   in Manager role could be post-processed using the information kept in
   MIB files to include human-friendly OIDs names, tables indices and
   values representation. However, there is currently no provisioning in
   the PySNMP system for locating and loading up MIB files containing
   additional information on arbitrary OIDs. So the idea is to maintain
   an OID-to-MIB index to let PySNMP load relevant MIB automatically on
   demand.

#. Stream sockets support. Currently, PySNMP transport subsystem only
   supports datagram-type network sockets. That covers UDP-over-IPv4 and
   UDP-over-IPv6. However, SNMP engine can potentially run over
   stream-oriented protocols what would let it support TCP-over-IPv4,
   TCP-over-IPv6 and SSL/TSL transports. Neither of these is currently
   implemented with PySNMP.

#. AgentX implementation. We anticipate many uses of this. For instance,
   having AgentX protocol support in pure-Python would let us write AgentX
   modules in pure-Python and attach them to high-performance Net-SNMP
   Agent. Or we could build and maintain a fully-featured, stand-alone
   PySNMP-based Agent so that users would write their own AgentX extensions
   what would comprise a complete SNMP Agent solution at lesser effort.

#. A DBMS-based SMI. Currently implemented SMI takes shape of live Python
   objects that let user hook up his own handler on any existing Managed
   Object Instance. That's flexible and working approach in many cases,
   however sometimes, for instance when Management Instrumentation is
   inherently DBMS-based, it may be more efficient to move the entire
   SMI/MIB subsystem into a database. PySNMP engine would talk to it
   through its simple and well defined SMI API.

Stand-alone PySNMP-based tools
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

#. SNMP Proxy Forwarder. That would be a stand-alone, application-level
   proxy service supporting all SNMP versions, multiple network transports,
   Command and Notification SNMP message types. Its anticipated features
   include extensive configuration facilities, fine-grained access
   control and logging.

   **Done:** see `SNMP Proxy Forwarder`_.

#. SNMP Trap Receiver. We see this application as a simple yet flexible
   SNMP TRAP collector. It would listen on network sockets of different
   types receiving SNMP TRAP/INFORM notifications over any SNMP version
   and putting all the details into a database and possibly triggering
   external events.

#. Database backend for SNMP Simulator. We have already built a tool for
   simulating SNMP Agents based on a snapshot of their Management
   Instrumentation state. Current implementation uses a plain-text file
   for keeping and possibly managing the snapshot. Many users of the
   Simulator software requested a value variation feature to be supported
   so that simulated Agents would look live, not static. We consider this
   variation and also dependencies features would be best implemented as
   a relational database application. So we are planning to put some more
   efforts into the Simulator project as time permits.

   **Done:** since `snmpsim`_ 0.2.4.

If you need some particular feature - please,
open a feature request via a `GitHub issue`_ . Once we
see a greater demand in particular area, we would re-arrange our
development resources to meet it sooner.

You could greater speed up the development of particular feature by
sponsoring it. Please contact `LeXtudio Inc.`_ to discuss details.

Related Resources
-----------------

- `Support Options`_
- :doc:`/quick-start`
- :doc:`/troubleshooting`
- :doc:`/faq/index`
