Answers to frequently asked questions (FAQs)
============================================

.. _reference manual: `gmx-manual-parent-dir`_

.. Migrated from old website

.. toctree::
   :maxdepth: 2
   :hidden:

Questions regarding |Gromacs| installation
------------------------------------------

#. Do I need to compile all utilities with MPI?

   With one rarely-used exception (:ref:`pme_error <gmx pme_error>`), only
   :ref:`mdrun <gmx mdrun>` is able to use the :ref:`MPI <mpi-support>`
   parallelism. So you only need to use the ``-DGMX_MPI=on`` flag
   when :ref:`configuring <configure-cmake>` for a build intended to run
   the main simulation engine :ref:`mdrun <gmx mdrun>`. Generally that
   is desirable when running on a multi-node cluster, and necessary
   when using multi-simulation algorithms. Usually also installing a
   build of GROMACS configured without MPI is convenient for users.


#. Should my version be compiled using double precision?

   In general, |Gromacs| only needs to be build in its default mixed-precision mode.
   For more details, see the discussion in Chapter 2 of the `reference manual`_.
   Sometimes, usage may also depend on your target system, and should be decided
   upon according to the :ref:`individual instructions <gmx-special-build>`.

Questions concerning system preparation and preprocessing
---------------------------------------------------------

#. Where can I find a solvent :ref:`coordinate file <gmx-structure-files>` for use with :ref:`solvate <gmx solvate>`?

   Suitable equilibrated boxes of solvent :ref:`structure files <gmx-structure-files>` can be found
   in the ``$GMXDIR/share/gromacs/top`` directory. That location will be searched by default
   by :ref:`solvate <gmx solvate>`, for example by using ``-cs spc216.gro`` as an argument.
   Other solvent boxes can be prepared by the user as described
   on the manual page for :ref:`solvate <gmx solvate>` and elsewhere.
   Note that suitable topology files will be needed for the solvent boxes to be useful in
   :ref:`grompp <gmx grompp>`. These are available for some force fields, and may be
   found in the respective subfolder of ``$GMXDIR/share/gromacs/top``.

#. How to prevent :ref:`solvate <gmx solvate>` from placing waters in undesired places?

   Water placement is generally well behaved when solvating proteins, but can be difficult when setting up
   membrane or micelle simulations. In those cases, waters may be placed in between the
   alkyl chains of the lipids, leading to problems later :ref:`during the simulation <blowing-up>`.
   You can either remove those waters by hand (and do the accounting for molecule types in the
   :ref:`topology <top>` file), or set up a local copy of the ``vdwradii.dat`` file from the ``$GMXLIB``
   directory, specific for your project and located in your working directory. In it, you can
   increase the vdW radius of the atoms, to suppress such interstitial insertions.
   Recommended e.g. at a common `tutorial`_ is the use of 0.375 instead of 0.15.

.. _tutorial: http://www.mdtutorials.com/gmx/lysozyme/03_solvate.html

#. How do I provide multiple definitions of bonds / dihedrals in a topology?

   You can add additional bonded terms beyond those that are normally defined for a residue (e.g. when defining
   a special ligand) by including additional copies of the respective lines under the
   ``[ bonds ]``, ``[ pairs ]``, ``[ angles ]`` and ``[ dihedrals ]`` sections in the ``[ moleculetype ]``
   section for your molecule, found either in the :ref:`itp` file
   or the :ref:`topology <top>` file. This will **add** those extra terms to the potential energy evaluation,
   but **will not** remove the previous ones. So be careful with duplicate entries. Also keep in mind that this **does not**
   apply to duplicated entries for ``[ bondtypes ]``, ``[ angletypes ]``, or ``[ dihedraltypes ]``, in force-field
   definition files, where duplicates overwrite the previous values.

#. Do I really need a :ref:`gro` file?

   The :ref:`gro` file is used in |Gromacs| as a unified :ref:`structure file <gmx-structure-files>` format
   that can be read by all utilities. The large majority of |Gromacs| routines can also use other file
   types such as :ref:`pdb`, with the limitations that no velocities are available in :ref:`this case <gmx-need-for-gro>`.
   If you need a text-based format with more digits of precision, the :ref:`g96` format is suitable and supported.

#. Do I always need to run :ref:`pdb2gmx <gmx pdb2gmx>` when I already produced an :ref:`itp` file elsewhere?

   You don't need to prepare additional files if you already have all :ref:`itp` and :ref:`top` files prepared through other tools.

   Examples for those are `CHARMM-GUI <http://www.charmm-gui.org/>`__, `ATB (Automated Topology Builder) <https://atb.uq.edu.au/>`__,
   `pmx <http://pmx.mpibpc.mpg.de/instructions.html>`__, and `PRODRG <http://davapc1.bioch.dundee.ac.uk/cgi-bin/prodrg>`__.

#. How can I build in missing atoms?

   |Gromacs| has no support for building coordinates of missing non-hydrogen atoms. If your system is missing some part,
   you will have to add the missing pieces using external programs to avoid the :ref:`missing atom <gmx-atom-missing>`
   error. This can be done using programs such as `Chimera <https://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/>`__ in combination
   with `Modeller <https://salilab.org/modeller/>`__, `Swiss PDB Viewer <https://spdbv.vital-it.ch/>`__,
   `Maestro <https://www.schrodinger.com/maestro>`__. **Do not run** a simulation that had missing atoms unless
   you know exactly why it will be stable.

#. Why is the total charge of my system not an integer like it should be?

   In :ref:`floating point <gmx-floating-point>` math, real numbers can not be displayed to arbitrary precision
   (for more on this, see e.g. `Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating-point_arithmetic>`__). This means
   that very small differences to the final integer value will persist, and |Gromacs| will not lie to you and
   round those values up or down. If your charge differs from the integer value by a larger amount, e.g. at least
   0.01, this usually means that something went wrong during your system preparation

Questions regarding simulation methodology
------------------------------------------

#.  Should I couple a handful of ions to their own temperature-coupling bath?

    **No**. You need to consider the minimal size of your
    temperature coupling groups, as explained in :ref:`gmx-thermostats` and more
    specifically in :ref:`gmx-thermostats-dont`, as well as the implementation
    of your chosen thermostat as described in the `reference manual`_.

#.  Why do my grompp restarts always start from time zero?

    You can choose different values for :mdp:`tinit` and :mdp:`init-step`.

    .. todo:: Add "Continuing simulations" content (label: gmx-cont-simulation) and link.

        e.g. ``:ref:`Continuing simulations <gmx-cont-simulation>`.``

#.  Why can't I do conjugate gradient minimization with constraints?

    Minimization with the conjugate gradient scheme can not be performed with constraints
    as described in the `reference manual`_, and some additional information
    on `Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjugate_gradient_method>`__.

#.  How do I hold atoms in place in my energy minimization or simulation?

    Groups may be frozen in place using ``freeze groups`` (see the `reference manual`_).
    It is more common to use a set of position
    restraints, to place penalties on movement of the atoms. Files that control this
    kind of behaviour can be created using :ref:`genrestr <gmx genrestr>`.

#.  How do I extend a completed a simulation to longer times?

    Please see the section on :ref:`managing long simulations`.
    You can either prepare a new :ref:`mdp` file, or extend the simulation time
    in the original :ref:`tpr` file using :ref:`convert-tpr <gmx convert-tpr>`.

    .. todo:: #.  How do I complete a crashed simulation?

       Need gmx-cont-crash doc target.

       .. code-block:: none

           This can be easily achieved using the checkpoint reading
           :ref:`available <gmx-cont-crash>` in |Gromacs| versions newer than 4.

    .. todo:: #.  How can I do a simulation at constant pH?

       Need gmx-howto-cph doc target.

        .. code-block:: none

           This is a rather large topic, and you should at least read the short
           :ref:`Constant pH How-To <gmx-howto-cph>` and all of the literature
           included there to get an overview over the topic.

#.  How should I compute a single-point energy?

    This is best achieved with the ``-rerun`` option to :ref:`mdrun <gmx mdrun>`.
    See the :ref:`single-point energy` section.

Parameterization and Force Fields
---------------------------------

#.  I want to simulate a molecule (protein, DNA, etc.) which complexes with
    various transition metal ions, iron-sulfur clusters, or other exotic species.
    Parameters for these exotic species aren't available in force field X.
    What should I do?

    First, you should consider how well :ref:`MD <gmx-md>` will actually describe your
    system (e.g. see some of the `recent literature <https://dx.doi.org/10.1021%2Facs.chemrev.6b00440>`__).
    Many species are infeasible to model without either atomic polarizability, or QM treatments.
    Then you need to prepare your own set of parameters and add a new residue
    to your :ref:`force field <gmx-force-field>` of choice. Then you will have to validate that
    your system behaves in a physical way, before continuing your simulation studies. You could
    also try to build a more simplified model that does not rely on the complicated additions,
    as long as it still represents the correct *real* object in the laboratory.

#.  Should I take parameters from one force field and apply them inside another that is missing them?

    **NO**. Molecules parametrized for a given
    :ref:`force field <gmx-force-field>` will not behave in a physical manner when interacting with
    other molecules that have been parametrized according to different standards. If your
    required molecule is not included in the force field you need to use, you will
    have to parametrize it yourself according to the methodology of this force field.

Analysis and Visualization
--------------------------

.. todo:: #.  How do I visualize a trajectory?

   gmx-howto-visualize doc target:

   .. code-block:: none

       Use one of the number of different programs that can visualize
       coordinate :ref:`files and trajectories <gmx-howto-visualize>`.

#.  Why am I seeing bonds being created when I watch the trajectory?

    Most visualization softwares determine the bond status of atoms depending
    on a set of predefined distances. So the bonding pattern created by them
    might not be the one defined in your :ref:`topology <top>` file. What
    matters is the information encoded in there. If the software has read
    a :ref:`tpr <tpr>` file, then the information is in reliable agreement
    with the topology you supplied to :ref:`grompp <gmx grompp>`.

#.  When visualizing a trajectory from a simulation using PBC, why are there holes or my peptide leaving the simulation box?

    Those holes and molecules moving around are just a result of molecules
    ranging over the :ref:`box boundaries and wrapping around <gmx-pbc>`,
    and are not a reason for concern. You can fix the visualization using :ref:`trjconv <gmx trjconv>`
    to prepare the structure for analysis.

#.  Why is my total simulation time not an integer like it should be?

    As the simulation time is calculated using :ref:`floating point arithmetic <gmx-floating-point>`,
    rounding errors can occur but are not of concern.
