/*! \page vlibFAQ Vector FAQ

by GRASS Development Team (https://grass.osgeo.org)

<dl>

<dt>What is the difference between line and boundary?</dt>
<dd>
Only boundaries are used to construct areas. Boundaries know the areas to their
left and right.
</dd>

<dt>What is the difference between feature id and category?</dt>
<dd>
A category, as the name implies, is used to assign a feature to a certain
category. A category is thus not a unique id, even though it can be used as
such. Unique feature id's are created automatically be the vector lib and can
change when the vector is modified (features added, deleted, topology rebuilt).
</dd>

<dt>In my module I need a unique identifier for feature. The identifier is for
internal use only, i.e values will be used to identify features only when
module is running. Can I use (internal) feature id for this?</dt>
<dd>
</dd>

If you want to be sure that feature number x is always the same, it is safer to
set categories such that they can be used as feature ids.
</dd>

<dt>I need a unique identifier of a feature. I'm using category for this. How
should I check and handle states when number of categories for one line is not
equal to 1?</dt>
<dd>
A category always belongs to a given layer. Check if there is one and only one
category for the desired layer. If there is no category value set, skip this
feature. If there are more categories set for the desired layer, the procedure
depends on the purpose of the module. For example, \gmod{v.extract} would
extract a feature if any of the categories set for the given layer is in the
list of categories to be selected.
</dd>

<dt>I'm using category as a unique identifier of a feature. Thus, the case when
number of categories is zero or more than one, I cannot continue in processing.
Should I print warning or should I call G_fatal_error()?</dt>
<dd>
Both cases are generally valid in GRASS. Do not print a warning, maybe a verbose
message. It is the responsibility of a module to make a reasonable plan how to
handle these cases.
</dd>

<dt>My module requires using categories. When iterating over features, my
algorithm have to bother with checking of input. It is possible to check
categories in some other way i.g., for the whole map at once?</dt>
<dd>
\code{.py}
# Python example using ctypes
# checking category for each feature
if areaCats.contents.n_cats == 0:
    # skip processing
    continue
\endcode
</dd>

<dt>What is feature and what is line (not particular geometry type GV_LINE
but the object read by Vect_read_line() function)?</dt>
<dd>
Vect_read_line() reads a feature from the coor file or from external
datasources which can be for native GRASS vectors of type GV_POINT,
GV_LINE, GV_BOUNDARY, GV_CENTROID or GV_FACE. In the code of the
vector library and modules, the word 'line' often refers to a feature in
general, not only to features of type GV_LINE.
</dd>

<dt>Can one feature have several categories? Do these categories have to be
assigned to one feature in different layers (i.e. can I assign two or more
categories to one feature in one layer)?</dt>
<dd>
GRASS supports M:N mapping of categories. Several features can share the same
category, and one feature can have several categories. Further more, one
feature can have several categories in the same layer. See manual of
\gmod{v.buffer} for an example.
</dd>

<dt>What can I expect to get from function Vect_read_line() according to
various combinations of features and categories in vector map?</dt>
<dd>
The return value of Vect_read_line() is the feature type, which must be
positive, otherwise the read request was illegal. Vect_read_line() fills the
Points and Cats structures with coordinates and categories.
</dd>

<dt>Why there is no function such as Vect_get_point() or
Vect_get_boundary_points()?</dt>
<dd>
Because Vect_read_line() does that, i.e. it can read points, lines,
boundaries, centroids, faces. The coordinates of these primitive features
are stored in one file, and this file does not have separate
sections for points, lines, boundaries, centroids, faces. The equivalent of
Vect_get_point() etc is done on module level by checking the return type of
Vect_read_line(). Further on, sometimes it is desired to work with more than
one type at the same time. That's the reason for
\code{.c}
if (!(ltype & type))
    continue;
\endcode
</dd>

<dt>Can I read areas with Vect_read_next_line()?</dt>
<dd>
No. An area is constructed from boundaries and centroids.
</dd>

<dt>What are the standard options for module which has a vector map without
attribute table as an input?</dt>
<dd>
Input, output, type. Sometimes layer and category lists.
</dd>

<dt>What are the standard options for module which has a vector map with
attribute table as an input?</dt>
<dd>
The above plus where for SQL where option.
</dd>

<dt>When should be layer number taken into account if user requires to do
so?</dt>
<dd>
If the user requires it, you have to take it into account if you read features
from a map or data from attribute table. More generally, whenever you work with
categories.
</dd>

<dt>After reading feature by Vect_read_line() function you should loop over
categories in line_cats structure?</dt>
<dd>
It depends. If the feature should only be processed if it belongs to a certain
category, yes.
</dd>

<dt>My module reads some data from attribute table columns specified by user.
What should I check before I can read from attribute table?</dt>
<dd>
If the columns exist. But sometimes column can be an expression of columns,
e.g. col_a/col_b. Otherwise nothing unusual.
</dd>

<dt>My module writes some data to attribute table columns specified by
user.</dt>
<dd>
What should I check before I can write to attribute table?
If the specified table doesn't exists, should I create one?
If the module does not create a new vector, and a table exists, check if the
column exists and is of the correct type, if not, create the column. If the
module does create a new vector, a new table must also be created.
</dd>

<dt>I should add features to vector map, add tables or columns only if \c
\-\-overwrite was specified, right?</dt>
<dd>
The behaviour for db operations is not cleary defined in GRASS. Quite a lot
works without \c \-\-overwrite. Try \gmod{v.db.update} or \gmod{v.to.db}.
</dd>

<dt>Checking user input is tedious are there any functions which makes it
easier?</dt>
<dd>
Not really. There is G_legal_filename(), Vect_legal_filename() and
Vect_check_input_output_name(). Module-specific options must be checked by the
module.
</dd>

<dt>How can I handle memory correctly?</dt>
<dd>
<ul>
<li>
Memory allocated by Vect_new_line_struct() and Vect_new_cats_struct() can be
automatically reallocated many times by various library functions. However at
the end of your work you have to deallocate memory by calling functions
Vect_destroy_line_struct() and Vect_destroy_cats_struct().
<li>
Structure Map_info is usually created on stack so no need for deallocating.
Structure Map_info is used by modules like this:
\code{.c}
struct Map_info In, Out;
\endcode
So, no pointers, no allocation, no deallocation.
</ul>
As a rule of thumb, whenever you use some \c Vect_new_*() function, there
should also be a corresponding \c Vect_destroy_*() function. These deallocating
functions need only be used if the \c Vect_new_*() functions are called in a
loop. A one-time call does not matter, memory is freed by the system when the
module exits.
</dd>

<dt>What is the purpose of cat_list and ilist structures?</dt>
<dd>
A cat_list is used to store a list of cats, e.g. from a cats option. The ilist
struct is a list of integers.
</dd>

<dt>How can I handle data without topology or data which are topologically
incorrect?</dt>
<dd>
Use Vect_read_next_line() function.
</dd>

<dt>How can I handle overlapping areas? Can I use boundaries (GV_BOUNDARY)
instead of areas (GV_AREA)?</dt>
<dd>
Overlapping boundaries are not topologically correct either. Either break
boundaries, or (internal use only) do not build areas, or use lines if lines
can hold all the info you need.
</dd>

<dt>Can I use boundaries or lines to represent topologically incorrect (i.e.
overlapping) areas?</dt>
<dd>
In general, overlapping areas must be broken up into non-overlapping
components. Some of the new areas will have several categories, one for each
original area. For internal use, lines may be ok. Use lines instead of
boundaries if you don't want to break into non-overlapping components.
</dd>

<dt>Region is not taken into account by vector library functions. Should my
module do the same or it should do its work only in current region?</dt>
<dd>
It depends what your module is supposed to do. See \gmod{v.in.ogr},
\gmod{v.in.region} or \gmod{v.to.rast} for examples where the current region is
considered.
</dd>

<dt>When should I use the digitization threshold value from vector map
metadata?</dt>
<dd>
</dd>

<dt>What is the advantage of automatically attaching centroids to areas? How
can one be sure that connecting will be successful?</dt>
<dd>
This question is unclear. What would be the alternative? The method to attach
centroids to areas is well tested and has been working reliably for many years.
</dd>

<dt>Are there any functions providing functionality of \gmod{v.to.rast} and
\gmod{r.to.vect} modules?</dt>
<dd>
No. Considering the large code base of these two modules, this would require
new libraries which in turn would depend on both the vector and the raster
libraries.
</dd>

<dt>What is Vector Simple Feature Access API? Is it related to OGC standard
(like ST_ functions in Postgis)?</dt>
<dd>
</dd>

</dl>

*/
