Learning from Examples » Graph Processing Pipeline | Taskflow QuickStart

# Learning from Examples » Graph Processing Pipeline

We study a graph processing pipeline that propagates a sequence of linearly dependent tasks over a dependency graph. In this particular workload, we will learn how to transform task graph parallelism into pipeline parallelism.

## Formulate the Graph Processing Pipeline Problem

Given a directed acyclic graph (DAG), where each node encapsulates a sequence of linearly dependent tasks, namely stage tasks, and each edge represents a dependency between two tasks at the same stages of adjacent nodes. For example, assuming `fi(u)` represents the `i`th-stage task of node `u`, a dependency from `u` to `v` requires `fi(u)` to run before `fi(v)`. The following figures shows an example of three stage tasks in a DAG of three nodes (`A`, `B`, and `C`) and two dependencies (`A->B` and `A->C`):

While we can directly create a taskflow for the DAG (i.e., each task in the taskflow runs `f1`, `f2`, and `f3` sequentially), we can describe the parallelism as a three-stage pipeline that propagates a topological order of the DAG through three stage tasks. Consider a valid topological order of this DAG, `A, B, C`, its pipeline parallelism can be illustrated in the following figure:

At the beginning, `f1(A)` runs first. When `f1(A)` completes, it moves on to `f2(A)` and, meanwhile, `f1(B)` can start to run together with `f2(A)`, and so on so forth. The straight line represents two parallel tasks that can overlap in time in the pipeline. For example, `f3(A)`, `f2(B)`, and `f1(C)` can run simultaneously. The following figures shows the task dependency graph of this pipeline workload:

As we can see, tasks in diagonal lines (lower-left to upper-right) can run in parallel. This type of parallelism is also referred to as wavefront parallelism, which sweeps parallel elements in a diagonal direction.

#### Note

Depending on the graph size and the number of stage tasks, task graph parallelism and pipeline parallelism can bring very different performance results. For example, a small graph will a long chain of stage tasks may perform better with pipeline parallelism than task graph parallelism, and vice versa.

## Create a Graph Processing Pipeline

Using the example from the previous section, we create a three-stage pipeline that encapsulates the three stage tasks (`f1, f2, f3`) in three pipes. By finding a topological order of the graph, we can transform the node dependency into a sequence of linearly dependent data tokens to feed into the pipeline. The overall implementation is shown below:

    #include <taskflow/taskflow.hpp>
    #include <taskflow/algorithm/pipeline.hpp>

    // 1st-stage function
    void f1(const std::string& node) {
      printf("f1(%s)\n", node.c_str());
    }

    // 2nd-stage function
    void f2(const std::string& node) {
      printf("f2(%s)\n", node.c_str());
    }

    // 3rd-stage function
    void f3(const std::string& node) {
      printf("f3(%s)\n", node.c_str());
    }

    int main() {

      tf::Taskflow taskflow("graph processing pipeline");
      tf::Executor executor;

      const size_t num_lines = 2;

      // a topological order of the graph
      //    |-> B
      // A--|
      //    |-> C
      const std::vector<std::string> nodes = {"A", "B", "C"};

      // the pipeline consists of three serial pipes
      // and up to two concurrent scheduling tokens
      tf::Pipeline pl(num_lines,

        // first pipe calls f1
        tf::Pipe{tf::PipeType::SERIAL, [&](tf::Pipeflow& pf) {
          if(pf.token() == nodes.size()) {
            pf.stop();
          }
          else {
            f1(nodes[pf.token()]);
          }
        }},

        // second pipe calls f2
        tf::Pipe{tf::PipeType::SERIAL, [&](tf::Pipeflow& pf) {
          f2(nodes[pf.token()]);
        }},

        // third pipe calls f3
        tf::Pipe{tf::PipeType::SERIAL, [&](tf::Pipeflow& pf) {
          f3(nodes[pf.token()]);
        }}
      );

      // build the pipeline graph using composition
      tf::Task init = taskflow.emplace([](){ std::cout << "ready\n"; })
                              .name("starting pipeline");
      tf::Task task = taskflow.composed_of(pl)
                              .name("pipeline");
      tf::Task stop = taskflow.emplace([](){ std::cout << "stopped\n"; })
                              .name("pipeline stopped");

      // create task dependency
      init.precede(task);
      task.precede(stop);

      // dump the pipeline graph structure (with composition)
      taskflow.dump(std::cout);

      // run the pipeline
      executor.run(taskflow).wait();

      return 0;
    }

### Find a Topological Order of the Graph

The first step is to find a valid topological order of the graph, such that we can transform the graph dependency into a linear sequence. In this example, we simply hard-code it:

    const std::vector<std::string> nodes = {"A", "B", "C"};

### Define the Stage Function

This particular workload does not propagate data directly through the pipeline. In most situations, data is directly stored in a custom graph data structure, and the stage function will just need to know which node to process. For demo's sake, we simply output a message to show which stage function is processing which node:

    // 1st-stage function
    void f1(const std::string& node) {
      printf("f1(%s)\n", node.c_str());
    }

    // 2nd-stage function
    void f2(const std::string& node) {
      printf("f2(%s)\n", node.c_str());
    }

    // 3rd-stage function
    void f3(const std::string& node) {
      printf("f3(%s)\n", node.c_str());
    }

#### Note

A key advantage of Taskflow's pipeline programming model is that we do not provide any data abstraction but give users full control over data management, which is typically application-dependent. In an application like this graph processing pipeline, data is managed in a global custom graph data structure, and any data abstraction provided by the library can become a unnecessary overhead.

### Define the Pipes

The pipe structure is straightforward. Each pipe encapsulates the corresponding stage function and passes the node into the function argument. The first pipe will cease the pipeline scheduling when it has processed all nodes. To identify which node is being processed at a running pipe, we use tf::Pipeflow::token to find the index:

    // first pipe calls f1
    tf::Pipe{tf::PipeType::SERIAL, [&](tf::Pipeflow& pf) {
      if(pf.token() == nodes.size()) {
        pf.stop();
      }
      else {
        f1(nodes[pf.token()]);
      }
    }},

    // second pipe calls f2
    tf::Pipe{tf::PipeType::SERIAL, [&](tf::Pipeflow& pf) {
      f2(nodes[pf.token()]);
    }},

    // third pipe calls f3
    tf::Pipe{tf::PipeType::SERIAL, [&](tf::Pipeflow& pf) {
      f3(nodes[pf.token()]);
    }}

### Define the Task Graph

To build up the taskflow for the pipeline, we create a module task with the defined pipeline structure and connect it with two tasks that output helper messages before and after the pipeline:

    tf::Task init = taskflow.emplace([](){ std::cout << "ready\n"; })
                            .name("starting pipeline");
    tf::Task task = taskflow.composed_of(pl)
                            .name("pipeline");
    tf::Task stop = taskflow.emplace([](){ std::cout << "stopped\n"; })
                            .name("pipeline stopped");
    init.precede(task);
    task.precede(stop);

### Submit the Task Graph

Finally, we submit the taskflow to the execution and run it once:

    executor.run(taskflow).wait();

Three possible outputs are shown below:

    # possible output 1
    ready
    f1(A)
    f2(A)
    f1(B)
    f2(B)
    f3(A)
    f1(C)
    f2(C)
    f3(B)
    f3(C)
    stopped

    # possible output 2
    f1(A)
    f2(A)
    f3(A)
    f1(B)
    f2(B)
    f3(B)
    f1(C)
    f2(C)
    f3(C)
    stopped

    # possible output 3
    ready
    f1(A)
    f2(A)
    f3(A)
    f1(B)
    f2(B)
    f1(C)
    f2(C)
    f3(B)
    f3(C)
    stopped

## Reference

We have applied the graph processing pipeline technique to speed up a circuit analysis problem. Details can be referred to our publication below:

- Cheng-Hsiang Chiu and Tsung-Wei Huang, "Efficient Timing Propagation with Simultaneous Structural and Pipeline Parallelisms," ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC), San Francisco, CA, 2022

Tab / T to search, Esc to close
…

Search for symbols, directories, files, pages or modules. You can omit any prefix from the symbol or file path; adding a `:` or `/` suffix lists all members of given symbol or directory.

Use ↓ / ↑ to navigate through the list, Enter to go. Tab autocompletes common prefix, you can copy a link to the result using ⌘ L while ⌘ M produces a Markdown link.

Sorry, nothing was found.